Monday, February 16, 2015

Review: THE KING AND THE CLOWN is a Bawdy, Heartfelt Period Classic


By Chris Horn

There’s no question that Korean period films have continued to increase in popularity in recent years as three of the top ten grossing Korean films by ticket admissions are set during the Joseon dynasty. As Korean studios allocate increasing resources to the next big period films they would do well to study Lee Joon-ik’s masterful The King and the Clown. Not only does Lee capture a thematically interesting story rounded out by compelling performances, but The King and the Clown is brilliant in its sympathetic look at all levels of Joseon society.

Kam Woo-sung stars as the charismatic, playful Jangsaeng, a street clown and accomplished tightrope walker. He’s joined by his younger, effeminate partner Gong-gil (played by a then unknown Lee Joon-gi). After Jangsaeng raises a firestorm of protest against their manager’s pimping of Gong-gil to rich noblemen, the pair flee to Seoul and quickly form a troupe with another trio of clowns. After remarking that the King’s bed, in reference to his infamous concubine Noksu (Kang Seong-yeon), is where the big money is, the group puts on a bawdy show mocking King Yeonsan.

When the King’s ministers discover the show, they immediately place the band of clowns under arrest and threaten them with flogging. Jangsaeng manages to convince his captors to let him perform the show for the King himself: if the King likes their performance they should be freed, if not he can kill them himself. Surprising the ministers, Noksu and the clowns themselves, the gambit works. King Yeonsan is enthralled with the performance and even brings them into his court as official court clowns. However, as the King takes an increasing interest in Gong-gil and mentally unravels, Jangsaeng and his friends fear their blessing may have actually been a curse.

Adapted from Kim Tae-woong’s stage play Yi, Lee and writer Choi Seok-hwan show superb judgment in limiting the scope of the narrative. Although this is a period drama, it never feels needlessly epic and the constrained story provides more focus on the actual characters and their complex relationships. Lee Joon-gi and Kam Woo-sung exhibit rare chemistry and we truly come to care about the two harlequins. Jangsaeng’s almost fatherly relationship with Gong-gil is clearly filling some empty void, and Lee makes careful note to establish the basis for their companionship as the film concludes.


But if there is a true star to The King and the Clown, it would have to be Jung Jin-young as King Yeonsan. With a character noted as being the most tyrannical of all the Joseon kings, one would be forgiven for expecting a caricature of evil, but instead Jung provides a nuanced performance as a young man who never had a chance. A king who can never escape comparisons to his well-respected father, he also witnessed his own mother’s forced suicide as she was betrayed by jealous concubines. His fixation on Gong-gil appears innocent at first, but by the time Gong-gil realizes he's in too deep it is too late. As King Yeonsan unwinds it becomes clear that he is a broken shell of a man bubbling over with emotional torment.

This is the brilliance of The King and the Clown: its insistence on shining a light on each member of society. We gain a relatively balanced look at different groups of Joseon society, from the tortured yet obviously privileged King to the lowly clowns who remember their peers cannot read as they go to recruit more members. Each character is distinctly human and flawed, even Jangsaeng who is initially motivated by the prospect of earning more money. While the film may shine a less sympathetic light on the court ministers, they too mount an understandable resistance to the unstable king whom they feel is desecrating the royal position and unfit to pragmatically rule the land.

Moreso than most of his peers, Lee does a masterful job balancing tone throughout The King and the Clown. The opening credits themselves set an initially serious tone as traditional instruments play over contemporary pieces of art along with ominous descriptions of King Yeonsan. Lee then parlays this into the raucous ribaldry of Jangsaeng and Gong-gil’s tightrope routine. This is a beat Lee continuously hits as the pair become established performers in the King’s court, but the lightheartedness gradually distorts into uneasiness as King Yeonsan becomes increasingly unhinged. Miraculous approval of their show turns awkward as the king himself partakes in the show and bows to Jangsaeng, raising questions as to who is really the king and who is the clown.

As more and more directors hope to break into the top grossing Korean films with their own period vehicles, they would do well to study the elements that made The King and the Clown such a strong film. A story that foregoes gimmicky cinematography and cookie-cutter characters has already paved the way for like-minded films to follow a decade later.

★★

This review also appeared on TheCineholic.com



Reviews and features on Korean film appear regularly on Modern Korean Cinema. For film news, external reviews, and box office analysis, take a look at the Korean Box Office UpdateKorean Cinema News and the Weekly Korean Reviews, which appear weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday mornings (Korean Standard Time).

To keep up with the best in Korean film you can sign up to our RSS Feed, like us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

2 comments:

  1. wa I agree with all ur opinions in the movie ..I happened to watch this movie last year and had a hard time figuring out what exactly was the meaning of it . At first I thought its just a movie centered about a love story between 2 men but eventually I realized "Gong-gil" was just sympathizing with the king and also Jangsaeng was not "in love" with Gong gil like everyone was saying ! I didn't see it that way ,he was as u said more fatherly toward him . was he supposed to stand there watching his friend and kid get treating like that against his will ?
    so yea now I got every meaning this movie have ..and yes its a great masterpiece .

    ReplyDelete
  2. I watched this film August of 2016 and it is several years late, I guess but good thing I did watch it because the film really tugged at my heart in the end. At first, I was hesitant to watch it since I don't like homosexual depictions on any film. Western films tend to show explicit sex scenes most of the time so it becomes an in your face type of slant. In this film, the homosexual theme was very subtle and one could have several interpretations how the two jesters really felt for each other. It can be either brotherly love, hence platonic or sexual love. It could also be mentor/mentee type of relationship. Or it could be a mixture of friendship, sexual attraction, and mentorship. The king's attraction is more sexual in nature. The minor characters also captured my attention and helped flesh out the storyline. Superb movie all through out and I couldn't believe it was a low-budget film. It relied on great acting of all characters, eye-catching costumes and cinematography, interesting storytelling despite the raunchiness at times, and subtleties of interweaving themes.

    ReplyDelete